There are many followers of Peter Obi who do not fully understand his approach to leadership and mentorship. Obi’s model is not built around handpicking loyalists for elective positions or manipulating political processes to guarantee their success. Rather, it is about blazing a trail for others to follow through personal example, integrity, and competence.
This does not mean Obi is indifferent to the political aspirations of his supporters. On the contrary, he has consistently supported followers who have contested elections at the federal, state, and local government levels. However, his idea of mentorship does not involve interfering in democratic processes to favour associates. It differs fundamentally from the godfather-style politics that has become common in Nigeria.
The late Nnamdi Azikiwe exemplified a similar leadership style. Azikiwe inspired countless individuals, both within and outside his immediate circle, to enter politics and pursue leadership roles. Yet he was not a political godfather. While Obafemi Awolowo saw disciples such as Lateef Jakande and Adekunle Ajasin emerge as governors under the UPN in the Second Republic, Azikiwe initially stayed away from the political arrangements that birthed the era. He eventually joined due to pressure from former associates, but it was largely politicians riding on his influence rather than direct protégés who emerged as governors in the South-East.
Another leader who exhibited aspects of this model was Olusegun Obasanjo. Obasanjo benefited from a network of people who had previously served under him and later rallied around his influence. As a former military Head of State, he understood power and eventually became more assertive during his second term as president. What is noteworthy, however, is that Obasanjo largely stepped back from direct government after leaving office, much as Obi did after completing his tenure as governor of Anambra State. This contrasts with the traditional godfather model, where political influence is maintained indefinitely to determine outcomes and successors.
The Obi model is preferable because it avoids the corruption and institutional damage that often accompany godfather politics. Once a leader begins manipulating primaries, imposing candidates, and determining outcomes behind the scenes, he becomes part of the very problem he claims to oppose. Such actions would undermine the credibility of the Obi brand.
This does not mean Obi should ignore the political development of his associates. Rather, his supporters should recognise that building sustainable political influence takes time. Their efforts may be better invested in strengthening the movement and working towards the emergence of an Obi presidency. Such an outcome would naturally elevate their profiles and create opportunities for appointments and leadership roles.
Politics extends far beyond elections and elective offices. Many successful politicians build influence through appointments, public service, and policy roles before contesting higher offices. In fact, there are far more appointive positions in government than elective ones. For many Obidients, especially those who are relatively new to politics, these opportunities could provide the experience and visibility needed to establish themselves.
The reality is that the 2023 Obi wave, which helped propel several political newcomers into public office, is unlikely to be replicated easily. The movement has since attracted many more ambitious politicians, leading to increased competition for nominations under any platform associated with Obi. Competition often breeds internal disagreements, and disagreements can weaken collective enthusiasm.
Furthermore, many Nigerians are now more cautious. Having seen some politicians elected on the back of the Obi movement later defect to parties they had campaigned against, voters may be less willing to support candidates solely because of their association with Obi. Future aspirants will increasingly be judged on their individual credibility and grassroots engagement.
Many Obi supporters possess strong national visibility but have yet to develop the local political structures required to win elections consistently. Electoral success at the constituency level is built over time through community engagement, visibility, constituency projects, and sustained relationships with local stakeholders.
Political appointments under a future Obi administration could help many supporters build that grassroots influence. Such positions would allow them to demonstrate competence, earn public trust, and establish the local credibility necessary for future electoral success. After all, Obi’s reputation today is not based solely on character and competence but also on the opportunity he had as governor to demonstrate those qualities in practice.
For this reason, patience is essential. Figures such as Aisha Yesufu, Randy Peters, and others who may feel disappointed by primary election outcomes should recognise that political careers are marathons rather than sprints. The path to lasting influence often involves service, persistence, and gradual growth rather than immediate electoral victories.
Ultimately, Obi is what he is because he stayed true to his principles and allowed his record to speak for itself. Those who identify with his movement may need to embrace the same long-term approach if they hope to build enduring political careers.
Published by Chuks Nwachuku
